<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Urban Meyer “Get” Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secfb.neswblogs.com/2009/05/19/urban-meyer-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secfb.neswblogs.com/2009/05/19/urban-meyer-tweets/</link>
	<description>The blog for SEC Football Fans!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:30:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Bull Gator</title>
		<link>http://secfb.neswblogs.com/2009/05/19/urban-meyer-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bull Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secfb.neswblogs.com/?p=524#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>To be fair, I did also say he does provide some updates that are valuable and I can see the point in the them.

The reason why I still don&#039;t see the point in items such as &quot;heading into a staff meeting&quot; or when other people say they use it so people know where they are is because that&#039;s exactly what voice mail and email are for.  People are using Twitter to say things like &quot;I&#039;m at the movies&quot; so their friends know why they aren&#039;t answering the phone or responding to an email.  But what happened to just leaving a message or waiting for someone to write you back?  Why do we need to know exactly why we can&#039;t reach someone?

With Meyer&#039;s situation, that&#039;s my point.  I get that there may be others closer to him that may like to know what he&#039;s up to, I still don&#039;t get why they can&#039;t just call, get his voice message, and think &quot;okay, he must be busy, I&#039;ll leave a message and he can get back to me.&quot;

I have nothing against people who use Twitter.  The more I learn about it, the more I realize how it can be valuable, but the need for everyone to know exactly why someone isn&#039;t getting back the them right that second is a little much to me.  Sometimes I don&#039;t answer the phone or respond to an email simply because I don&#039;t want to.  Does that mean I should be putting &quot;currently ignoring contact&quot; on my Twitter page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, I did also say he does provide some updates that are valuable and I can see the point in the them.</p>
<p>The reason why I still don&#8217;t see the point in items such as &#8220;heading into a staff meeting&#8221; or when other people say they use it so people know where they are is because that&#8217;s exactly what voice mail and email are for.  People are using Twitter to say things like &#8220;I&#8217;m at the movies&#8221; so their friends know why they aren&#8217;t answering the phone or responding to an email.  But what happened to just leaving a message or waiting for someone to write you back?  Why do we need to know exactly why we can&#8217;t reach someone?</p>
<p>With Meyer&#8217;s situation, that&#8217;s my point.  I get that there may be others closer to him that may like to know what he&#8217;s up to, I still don&#8217;t get why they can&#8217;t just call, get his voice message, and think &#8220;okay, he must be busy, I&#8217;ll leave a message and he can get back to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have nothing against people who use Twitter.  The more I learn about it, the more I realize how it can be valuable, but the need for everyone to know exactly why someone isn&#8217;t getting back the them right that second is a little much to me.  Sometimes I don&#8217;t answer the phone or respond to an email simply because I don&#8217;t want to.  Does that mean I should be putting &#8220;currently ignoring contact&#8221; on my Twitter page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Zook REALLY does not &#8220;Get&#8221; Twitter &#124; SEC Football Blogger</title>
		<link>http://secfb.neswblogs.com/2009/05/19/urban-meyer-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Zook REALLY does not &#8220;Get&#8221; Twitter &#124; SEC Football Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secfb.neswblogs.com/?p=524#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>[...] rest of his tweets are just like Urban Meyer&#8217;s. They are just updates on his day to day happenings, but the Tweets above crazy. Who yells into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rest of his tweets are just like Urban Meyer&#8217;s. They are just updates on his day to day happenings, but the Tweets above crazy. Who yells into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

